Tag Archives: Force
Physics is Kepler’s Rule expressed in Newtonian units
Wientje questions how density can be defined in terms of frequency and makes some other comments. My answer: >How exactly do ‘square seconds’ form a density in any meaningful way? Frequency f is the reciprocal of period T: T = … Continue reading
Filed under Density continuum, Force, Kepler's Rule, Leverrier, Newton
Gravity is not a force; gravity is a hoax
Commenting on this story I wrote that: Gravity is not a force; gravity is a hoax. I am glad that physics establishment finally is realizing this. teraflop replied: That’s certainly an unorthodox view. As far as I can make out … Continue reading
Filed under Branding, Force, Gravity, Kepler's Rule, Lagrange points, Newtonism
Dear physicist. . .
Newton’s Principia is based on Kepler’s rule understood as the definition of density. We postulate the density continuum defined by the rule R03/T02 = R3/T2. The entire Newtonian mechanics, Newton’s laws and Newton’s equations of motion are nothing more than … Continue reading
Filed under Physics
The end of the Newtonian cult?
The following have been established: Newton used Kepler’s rule to make astronomical computations Kepler’s rule is necessary and sufficient to compute orbits Orbits are independent of the Newtonian force Physicists refuse to accept these facts in order not to violate … Continue reading
Filed under Physics
Density continuum replaces matterful discontinuity
A matterful, forceful and discontinuous nature was postulated by Newton as a religious revelation in order to brand Kepler’s rule as Newton’s universal gravitation. Absolute discontinuity is never observed. Nature is consensual not absolute. We ignore Newton’s branding and go … Continue reading
Filed under Physics
The status of Newton’s force in physics
The Newtonian force has been found to be unphysical and non-existent by physicists. Force = ma = unphysical After finding out that force was unphysical and non-existent physicists replaced it with Einstein’s geodesic. But since Einstein’s General Relativity comes later … Continue reading
Filed under Physics
Is Newton’s constant a conventional unit?
I don’t understand this: If Newton’s force has been proved to be unphysical and non-existent by physicists themselves why are we still bound by 18th century derivations involving force? The only answer to this can be that Newton’s occult and … Continue reading
Filed under Physics
The Cavendish experiment hoax 3
A true scientific experiment is a carefully designed test to compare two statements. A true scientific experiment is an answer to a yes or no question. An academic physics experiment, on the other hand, is a circular experiment which tests … Continue reading
Filed under Physics
The Cavendish experiment hoax 2
My method is to question authority. Physicists go by what is legal. They never question a legal precedent. Physicists are like that proverbial new bride who always cut two inches of the roast before placing it in the pan because … Continue reading
Filed under Physics
The Cavendish experiment hoax 1
Backreaction has been running an interesting series of What if . . . questions. Here’s my very own What if . . . question about my previous post. What if it’s true that physicists have been measuring the non-existent occult … Continue reading
Filed under Physics
