This is a computation of Lagrange point L1 without Newtonian branding.
Objective
Compute Lagrange point L1 without using Newtonian branding.
Observation
- Kepler’s Rule is an operational geometric rule that ties the period and radius of an orbit; Kepler’s Rule successfully describes orbits without any Newtonian ideological terms attached to it;
- Newton’s laws are non-functioning philosophical axioms expressed as ideological labels and they must be eliminated from operational formulas used to compute orbits.
To uphold their doctrine of Newtonian atomic materialism, physicists use Newtonian decorative labels to brand Kepler’s Rule as Newton’s laws. This is a scientific fraud.
Why do physicists perpetuate scientific fraud to save Newton’s authority?
Because nature is not Newtonian; but every practicing professional physicist is a disciple of Newton.
An academic physicist is somebody who has been indoctrinated during his Newtonian physics education and was accepted to the Brotherhood when he successfully earned his license (the PhD) to practice and to perpetuate tirelessly the Newtonian religion by teaching the Newtonian creed to new candidates.
Physicists worship Newton; but Nature rejects Newtonian occult force and atomic materialism.
Therefore, Newton’s fanatic disciples who call themselves physicists must uphold their founder Newton’s authority against Nature by corrupting the old science of physics into the very definition of the scholastic anti-science.
Academic physics is the modern incarnation of scholasticism
To uphold Newton’s authority physicists invented what they call a “derivation.” A derivation is a prayer to Newton. A derivation is the ritual elimination of the Newtonian terms to arrive at Kepler’s Rule. The hoax of writing and then eliminating ideological Newtonian terms to brand Kepler’s Rule as Newton’s Laws has been the official method of academic physics since Newton; in fact, Newtonian physicists have been blindly repeating the same hoax first initiated by Newton in his Principia.
Take a look at this official official Newtonian “derivation” of the Lagrange point L1 and see for yourself how Newton’s disciple performs his prayer to Newton by writing and then eliminating Newtonian ideological terms over Kepler’s Rule. There are no Newtonian terms in the final statement used to compute orbits. The computation is done with Kepler’s Rule. The ideological Newtonian part is written and eliminated. And you thought that scholasticism was dead in the 18th century with the “scientific revolution.”
Nature does not recognize Newtonian ideology
The decorative labels used by physicists in their prayers to Newton include
- G (ideologically labeled as Newton’s Universal Constant of Gravitation by Newton’s disciples);
- M (mass of larger body);
- m (mass of smaller body);
- F (Newtonian occult and magical force).
To assert Newton’s authority, physicists start their prayer to Newton by writing these decorative terms and then one by one they eliminate them to arrive at Kepler’s Rule. Then they compute orbits by using Kepler’s Rule without Newtonian ideological terms but they claim to have used Newton’s laws.
Kepler’s Rule is independent of units
Newton’s disciples claim that Kepler’s Rule works only if it is used with units named after Newton. This is wrong; it is more than wrong, this is a scientific fraud; to impute to nature Newtonian doctrine is a crime against science.
In this computation I use no Newtonian ideological terms and no Newtonian units. Newton himself did not use any Newtonian units; Newton did not know “Newton’s Universal Constant of Gravitation.” That was invented by Newton’s zealous disciples in the 19th century to brand Kepler’s Rule with Newtonian units.
Newton’s disciples the physicists have corrupted the old science of physics into a hoax
Who would insert ideological terms into equations in order to eliminate them later? This practice of fouling mathematical equations with ideological terms to prove their own doctrine has been a well-established tradition of the European academic scholasticism practiced for millennia by the scholastic doctors of philosophy.
Today, scholastic doctors of philosophy call themselves physicists.
Instead of using rotten scholastic and ideological methods of scholastic doctors of philosophy who call themselves physicists, here, I start directly from Kepler’s Rule without any Newtonian branding and compute the value of L1. In the computations of the L1 no Newtonian branding is used.
The world is not Newtonian
This computation proves that astronomy is not Newtonian. More generally, Newtonism is a religion and a scientific hoax; Newtonism is rejected by nature. What is fundamental is Kepler’s Rule; Newton’s laws are superficial branding of Kepler’s Rule.
To compute the Lagrange point L1 I use only distances and periods; there is no reason to use any dynamical or magical or occult quantity invented by Newton and Newton’s disciples.
R_0 is the Earth-Sun distance; T_0 is the period of the Earth around the Sun. Both R_0 and T_0 are unity, corresponding to the Astronomical Unit (AU) and 1 year.
r_0 is the Earth-Moon distance expressed in AU and t_0 is the period of the Moon expressed in Earth year.
r is the distance from Earth to the L1, the quantity we want to calculate.
Each and every quantity used in the computation is a length or an angle. No Newtonian terms are used in the computation.
Kepler’s Rule for Sun and the Earth:
Kepler’s Rule for the Earth and the Moon:
Solve for T and t:
L1 point is where T and t are equal:
Substitute:
Collect constant terms on one side:
Invert to match the Newtonian derivation here:
Solve for r and compute:
Solution for r as calculated by WolframAlpha:
Comparison of the value of L1 computed by praying to Newton and computed without reference to Newton and physics:
L1_Newton is the L1 point computed by Newton’s disciples by praying to their god Newton; and L1_Kepler is the value computed scientifically by using Kepler’s Rule without ideological Newtonian branding of physics. Results are equivalent.
A professional physicist is a scholastic doctor of philosophy who is bound by his professional oath to forever uphold Newton’s authority and will always use the prayer version; a scientist will prefer the scientific version and apply Kepler’s Rule directly. It is up to you to decide.
