Monthly Archives: November 2008

Science this week 8

Only in physics a discredited, rescinded, superseded and subsumed law will still be celebrated as “Newton’s universal law of gravitation” because it’s been the favorite law of the founder. Eschatology used to belong to theology now it belongs to physics. … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Science this week

The gap between theory and practice

In physics there is always an irreconcilable difference between the story a physicist tells about what an equation does and what the equation actually does. A physicist will always repeat the legal physics that’s been associated with that equation. As … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Physics

Domains

Look at the world with the unit of organism. This view follows from the view of matterless world Organism Organisms & generalize & simplify & eliminate scholastic chaff theorems or statements or propositions & definitions For instance I propose something … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Cosmology, Organisms, Physics

Physics on fire

Someone wrote that the person who made the greatest impact on mankind was the person who destroyed the Library of Alexandria. By destroying the largest library of the world with human knowledge collected for hundreds of years, he greatly inhibited … Continue reading

3 Comments

Filed under Physics

Physical propositions

In this article I’ve stated 10 propositions. These are propositions, meaning that they are provisional statements that need to be proved. I am not looking for mathematical proof, since these are not mathematical statements. I am looking for consensus. Take … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Physics

Would you like your physical eschatology hot or cold?

1. Eschatology belongs to theology dop is the new dot 2. Pushing the old scholastic racket in the 21st century 3. Physical eschatology science excludes eschatology regulate physics there are no maps of totality 4. Mark’s reasoning is full of … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Cosmology

A critique of Newton’s law of universal gravitation – 3

This is the third part of my commentary on this article about universal gravitation. In this part I will talk about 1. How physicists confuse themselves with their own slogans 2. Terrestrial and celestial realms are unified by Kepler’s rule … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Physics

Science this week 7

Photon, universal gravitation, Big Bang: Rest in peace. But old physical quantities never die, they continue as ghosts and puns. Cosmic variance blog becomes a part of the big media. Physics-media synergy has a history. Cosmology is revealed knowledge not … Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under Physics

Why are fundamental physical quantities puns?

Now I understand why puns exist in physics. Physics is not bound by mathematical logic does not respect the law of the excluded middle. In physics precedence overrules mathematical logic. That’s why physicists can overrule mathematical logic by legal precedence … Continue reading

7 Comments

Filed under Physics, Puns

Atoms are units and not the absolute indivisible

Physicists have corrupted the word atom to exploit it for their own professional gain. Now what does not divisible mean? In academic fields where the language is protected from semantic corrupters known as doctors of philosophy, specifically, physicists, indivisible means, … Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized